Legal Opinion

Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 2013No. A138136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRICK, J. *

The primary issue in this case is whether a public agency can be required under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.)* 1 (the Act or the CPRA) to seek records it does not prepare, own, use or retain in the conduct of its business. Real party in interest Reuters America LLC (Reuters) filed a petition for writ of mandate in the superior court under the CPRA requesting individual fund information for investments made by the Regents of the University of California (the Regents). 2 The superior court granted the writ and found that the Regents was required…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Forsham v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lee v. JasmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Sander v. State Bar of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. City of Glendale v. Marcus Cable Associates, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API