Legal Opinion

Gonser v. Leland Detroit Manfg. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1940No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 40,784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Plaintiff invented a “Meat Tenderizer and Cutter” and was granted patent No. 2,025,505 on December 24, 1935. The invention differed in some limited but important details from the devices known in the prior art. Defendant is a manufacturer of automotive parts and other specialties. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby defendant agreed to manufacture and sell the machine invented by plaintiff, and to make a proper accounting and pay the agreed royalties. It was provided that the rights of the parties should terminate in 30 days after notice to that effect. Such notice had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Kokomo Fence MacHine Co. v. KitselmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. SeaksMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. New Britain Machine Co. v. YeoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. Rubsam Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. New Britain MacHine Co. v. W. Lloyd Yeo, Administrator, Estate of Joseph H. Hoern, W. Lloyd Yeo, Administrator, Estate of Joseph H. Hoern v. New Britain MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API