Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Seaks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1941No. Docket No. 12, Calendar No. 40,931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff and appellant sought an accounting and injunctive relief. He claims that he and defendant entered into a written undated contract in January, 1937, in which plaintiff agreed to make available to defendant a “program for the sale of annuity and other insurance contracts in connection with the establishment by employers of pension trust plans,” and to assist defendant in contacting clients and in any other matters of detail necessary to consummate a plan for a particular client, et cetera; that defendant agreed not to use the plan or to attempt to use it without disclosing to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Daily v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Davidow v. Wadsworth Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Calhoun County v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Nash v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Anderson v. Cactus Heights Country ClubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Moore v. St Clair CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API