Legal Opinion
New Britain MacHine Co. v. W. Lloyd Yeo, Administrator, Estate of Joseph H. Hoern, W. Lloyd Yeo, Administrator, Estate of Joseph H. Hoern v. New Britain MacHine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1966No. 16287_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
358 F.2d 397
149 U.S.P.Q. 76
NEW BRITAIN MACHINE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. Lloyd YEO, Administrator, Estate of Joseph H. Hoern, et
al., Defendants-Appellees.
W. Lloyd YEO, Administrator, Estate of Joseph H. Hoern, et
al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
NEW BRITAIN MACHINE CO., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 16211, 16287.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
March 8, 1966.
Roy C. Hopgood, New York City, and Palmer S. McGee, Jr., Hartford, Conn., for New Britain Machine Co., Milton E. Higgs, Higgs & Higgs, Bay City, Mich., on the brief, John M. Calimafde, Arthur M. Lieberman, Hopgood & Calimafde, New…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- De Long Corporation v. Joseph E. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Allison Bros. v. AllisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.