Legal Opinion

Mattus v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1926No. 4726PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error brings for review the judgment rendered against him upon his conviction on two counts of an indictment; the first charging him with violation of the Act of December 17, 1914, as amended February 24, 1919 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § '6287g), in selling, dispensing, and distributing morphine not then and there in-nor from the original stamped package; the other charging him with violation of the Act of February 9, 1909, as amended January 17,1914, and May 26, 1922 (Comp. St. Ann.- Supp. 1923, § 8801), in receiving, buying, selling, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. Vachina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  3. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  4. Swan v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  5. Winkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Jasper J. Morrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Papani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Mullaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API