Winkler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to" the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Chester 'C. Winkler was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor, in violation of the National Prohibition Act, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of possessing intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 et seq.). Before the trial he interposed a motion for' the' return of intoxicating liquor taken from his person at the time of his arrest, or in lieu thereof to suppress all evidence in reference thereto, and all other evidence, *203knowledge of which was gained from the search of his person. The motion was supported by affidavit, but the affidavit itself does not appear in the record. The court granted the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vachina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Snyder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Purkey v. MabyIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Town of Blacksburg v. BeamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mattus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- United States v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
- United States v. YanezDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946