Vachina v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). His contention is that the intoxicating liquor which was found at his place of business, and which was admitted in evidence against him, was obtained by means of a search warrant, and that the search warrant was void for want of a sufficient affidavit. The affidavit for the ■warrant was made by a prohibition enforcement agent. After describing the premises of the plaintiff in error, which were said to con*36sist of a soft drink establishment known as the “Alpine Winery,” the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
- United States v. SnyderDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1922
- United States v. CamarotaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1922
- In re MobileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1922
- Kathriner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
3Cited by49 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.