Legal Opinion

Mullaney v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1936No. 7916PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants were convicted, on four counts of an indictment, of violating the laws relating to narcotic drugs and appeal. The first count charged sale of morphine not in or from the original stamped package. The second count charged sale of morphine not in pursuance of a written order on a form issued in blank for that purpose by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The third count charged unlawful concealment of morphine. The fourth count charged defendants with the purchase of narcotic drugs not in or from the original stamped package.

Assignments of error numbered 23 to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Parmagini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Las Vegas Merchant Plumbers Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Robert McClure Jr., and Donald Gaxiola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API