Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Moss

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 1984No. 84-82PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by dismissing his complaint and amended complaint. We affirm. Jurisdiction is in this court to construe the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court, Rule 29 (l)(c).

In the complaint, which sounded in tort, plaintiff alleged that he was employed by the defendant and was injured by a fellow employee. The complaint did not contain an allegation of negligence on the part of the defendant nor did it contain an averment of negligence by the fellow employee. It recited only that plaintiff was injured when an employee dropped a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Eastman Kodak Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Armstrong v. HarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Hollingsworth v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF ROGERSSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. URREY CERAMIC TILE CO. INC. v. MosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API