Armstrong v. Harrell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellants filed a petition in county court alleging that they have no reasonable means of access to their land. They asked that a road be established across appellee’s property pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 76-110 (Repl. 1981). The statute requires a petitioner to make a deposit sufficient to pay all costs and expenses and the county judge to appoint road viewers to examine the route proposed or any other route they deem proper. If the road viewers determine that a road is necessary, they are then required to lay out the road, make an estimate of the damages to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pippin v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Dowling v. EricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Reeves v. Ark. La. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Texas & St. Louis Railway v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Crockett Motor Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Ratliff v. MossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Yates v. SturgisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Broach v. City of HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- St. John v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.