Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF ROGERS

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 1, 1993No. 92-435PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellants, Lorene Hollingsworth and Don Gore, brought this malicious prosecution and tort of outrage case after having prevailed in an earlier federal lawsuit where the appellees claimed appellants had violated the federal “RICO” statutes. In that federal action, appellees alleged the appellants were involved in racketeering activities by laundering illegal funds, committing mail fraud and criminal enterprise, misusing credit card numbers, forging documents and other similar fraudulent conduct. The federal court had allowed the appellees to obtain a prejudgment attachment,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deitsch v. TillerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Rabalaias v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Ratliff v. MossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Miles v. SouthernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. The Ballard Grp. Inc. v. BP Lubricants USA Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Country Corner Food and Drug, Inc. v. FIRST STATE BANK AND TRUST CO OF CONWAYSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Brown v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Croom v. YountsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API