Legal Opinion

McElhone v. Geror

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1940No. 32,443PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Suit for injunction. From the order overruling his demurrer to the complaint (the trial judge having certified the question as important and doubtful), defendant appeals.

Plaintiff and defendant are competitors in the retail grocery trade. The complaint alleges that defendant was selling goods “at less than the cost thereof, for the purpose and with the effect of injuring competitors and destroying competition, including the business of this plaintiff.” The relief sought is an injunction, under L. 1987, c. 116, as amended by L. 1989, c. 403 (“An act to define and prohibit unfair…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Hartsock-Flesher Candy Co. v. Wheeling Wholesale Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lane Distributors, Inc. v. TiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. People v. Pay Less Drug StoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API