Conkey v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The case at bar concerns three entries of pistachio nuts, cracked, roasted, and salted. They were classified for duty as edible nuts, prepared or preserved, under paragraph 759 of the Tariff Act of 1922, and were claimed to be dutiable as pistache nuts, under paragraph 755 thereof. The respective paragraphs are as follows:
Par. 755. Cream or Brazil nuts, 1 cent per pound; filberts, not shelled, 2J4 cents per pound; shelled, 5 cents per pound; pignolia nuts, 1 cent per pound; pistache nuts, 1 cent per pound.
Par. 759. Edible nuts, shelled or unshelled, not specially provided for, 1 cent per…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chong Kee Jan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970