Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Housing Authority of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2006No. 04-0147PublishedCited by 544 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

In this appeal we address the issues of whether a tenant may appeal from an adverse judgment in a forcible detainer action without posting a supersedeas bond, and whether a forcible detainer action is moot when the tenant is no longer in possession of the premises and her lease has expired. Answering both questions in the affirmative, we dismiss the case as moot and vacate the underlying judgments.

I. Background

Petitioner Theresa Marshall leased an apartment from a non-profit public facility corporation managed by the Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio for a term beginning on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HallmanTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Valley Baptist Medical Center v. Gonzalez Ex Rel. M.G.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by544 opinions

  1. Coinmach Corp. F/K/A Solon Automated Services, Inc. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Whm Custom Services, Inc., and Disa, Inc. v. Gilberto RinconesTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Unifund CCR Partners v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Salaymeh v. Plaza Centro, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. Wilhelm v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

539 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API