Legal Opinion
Unifund CCR Partners v. Weaver
Texas Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 2008No. 07-0682PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Per curiam
Unifund CCR Partners sued Kenneth Weaver to recover an unpaid credit card debt. Unifund attached to its citation requests for disclosure and admissions. Shortly after he was served, Weaver, acting pro se, filed a letter answer with his responses to the requests attached. Weaver’s response to each request for admission was identical: “DEFENSE: TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES {SECTION 16.004 {A} {3},” which is the four-year statute of limitations on debt collection actions. The face of the response shows a copy was sent to Unifund’s attorney, and Weaver’s signature appears underneath the text,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- James Cleveland v. Rob Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Michael Lee Wyrick A/K/A Mike Wyrick and Gregory Michael Ruhnke A/K/A Greg Ruhnke v. Business Bank of Texas, N. A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- Thomas v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
- Medicus Insurance Co. v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.