Legal Opinion

State v. Despain

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 7, 1995No. 24297PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The State brought this declaratory judgment action in the Court’s original jurisdiction seeking to enjoin defendant from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. See In re Unauthorized Practice of Law Rules, 309 S.C. 304, 422 S.E. (2d) 123 (1992). We grant the injunction.

FACTS

In its complaint, the State alleges that defendant, who is not licensed to practice law in South Carolina or in any other state, is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by performing services which only a licensed attorney is authorized to perform.

Defendant argues that she merely operates a business which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. State Bar v. CramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Oregon State Bar v. GilchristOregon Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Doe v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Brown v. CoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Roberts v. LaConeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. McLaurenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Franklin v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API