Legal Opinion

State Bar v. Cramer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1976No. 56413, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

The history of this case is convoluted and confusing. The business of defendant Cramer which is the source of this controversy is described by Judge O’Hair in his findings following a hearing on December 18, 1972.

"In May, 1972, defendants Graham and Gordon *123formed a partnership to conduct a business that consisted of the sale of so-called 'divorce kits.’ Later in August they expanded their firm to include the defendant Cramer as a partner. Their business is known as Gordon-Graham & Cramer Associates, and its officés are located at 15800 W. McNichols, Detroit, Michigan.
"Defendants, who…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of HagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Contempt of DudzinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Florida Bar v. BrumbaughSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. In Re Contempt of DoughertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API