Legal Opinion

Lissner v. Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1943No. L. A. 18111, 18206PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCubtis, J.

— Presented here for review are certain pro-

ceedings in probate marking the effort of a receiver, appointed in a divorce action to take possession of the community property of the spouses and of the separate property of the defendant husband, to secure from the probate court a ratable distribution of a legacy left to the husband.

Anita M. Baldwin died testate on October 25, 1939. Her will provided, among other things, that pending administration her two children, Baldwin M. Baldwin and Dextra Baldwin Jones, who are the executor and the executrix, respectively, should each receive the sum of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wouldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Lissner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Tidewater Oil Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API