Legal Opinion

Lissner v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1944No. L. A. 18722PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to effectuate the disposition of a petition for ratable distribution in a pending estate.

In pursuance of appropriate allegations and the .consequent prayer of the complaint filed in a divorce action instituted by Rowena Schneider Baldwin against Baldwin M. Baldwin, the petitioner herein, Louis M. Lissner, was by an ex parte order dated December 15, 1939, appointed the receiver to take into possession the community property of the spouses and the separate property of the defendant husband. At that time the matter was made returnable on an order’ to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hilmer v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Pillsbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Richer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Jones v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API