Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Demichelis

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1929No. Docket No. 6952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Plaintiff by this action sought damages and an injunction based upon his claim of an easement upon the land of the defendant, an adjoining land owner. The easement claimed was the right to use as a turn row an open strip of land or avenue, which had been left unplanted to trees or vines, upon and along the boundary line between the lands of the two parties to this action. A turn row is understood by the parties as a place used, while cultivating the land, for the purpose of turning teams and tractors drawing cultivating machinery. Plaintiff is the owner of lots Nos. 30 and 31. Defendant is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Tarpey v. VeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Pinheiro v. BettencourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Jensen v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Crain v. HoeflingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Case v. UridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Madson v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API