Legal Opinion

Town of Whitehall v. Preece

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1998No. 96-648PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

¶1 The Fifth Judicial District Court, Jefferson County, declared invalid a petition for referendum to repeal a city ordinance requiring metering of water in the Town of Whitehall’s water system. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues raised on appeal:

¶3 1. Is this action barred under the applicable statute of limitation?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err when it determined that Town of Whitehall Ordinance Chapter 4.00 was administrative rather than legislative and was therefore exempt from the referendum proceedings allowed under the Montana Constitution and § 7-5-131(1), MCA?

¶5 The Town…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Supreme Court Adjudication of Initiative Petitions in NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Klosterman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Nicholson v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Wichita v. Kansas Taxpayers Network, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Chouteau County v. GrossmanMontana Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Garvin v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ravalli County v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Vagneur v. City of AspenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  4. MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR-126)Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Egan Slough v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API