Taylor v. Fishbaugh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendant, a physician, to recover a judgment for damages alleged to have been caused by the conduct of the defendant in improperly, negligently and carelessly prescribing for plaintiff Mrs. Taylor a remedy known as phanadorn. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of nonsuit entered upon motion of defendant at the termination of plaintiffs’ evidence.
Upon undertaking to treat Mrs. Taylor it became the duty of defendant to use reasonable care and diligence in the exercise of his skill and in the application of his learning to accomplish the purposes for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Patterson v. MarcusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Johnson v. ClarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Lemley v. Doak Gas Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Smith v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bickford v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945