Legal Opinion

Rodela v. Southern California Edison Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1957No. Civ. 21994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Personal injury action. Jury waived. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals, claiming primarily that she is entitled to the benefit of res ipsa loquitur and as a matter of law the evidence is insufficient to offset it.

Plaintiff was working for Academy Candle Company, which uses as a part of its equipment in making candles a boiler fired by 48 gas burners and producing heat of 400 to 600 degrees at the exit of the vent pipe. Normally this pipe extended in a vertical position on the west side of the building. It was only 18 inches from a power line pole of defendant Edison Company. On May…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pilkington v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Hughey v. CandoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Kavner v. HolzmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Koch v. Norris Public Power DistrictNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Scott v. Federal Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API