P & P Mehta LLC v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULT, Judge.
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 12-911(A)(1) (2003) permits the superior court, while a judicial review proceeding is pending, to stay the implementation of a state administrative agency decision when it finds “good cause” to do so. What the legislature meant when it created this standard is the subject of this opinion.
¶ 2 We are asked by the City of Phoenix, intervenor in this liquor license proceeding, to adopt from the jurisprudence dealing with an original proceeding for a preliminary injunction a stringent test for stay relief that requires a substantial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Blue Ridge Gas Company, Intervenor. Petition for Review of Order of the Federal Power Commission, No. 14583. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Appeal From United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Shoen v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Public Employment Relations Board v. StohrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Grady v. BarthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009