Legal Opinion

Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1992No. 72440PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

On July 6, 1989, the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation (Department) filed a complaint against Edward Ardt, a practicing dentist, alleging that he had violated provisions of the Illinois Dental Practice Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 111, par. 2301 et seq.). Specifically, the Department charged that Ardt had violated sections 23 and 45 of the Act and the administrative regulations promulgated thereunder by using the terms “family dentistry,” “total comfort,” and “quality” in his advertising.

Following an administrative hearing on the charges, Ardt was found to have violated…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Parents of M.M.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Desnick v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Vuagniaux v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API