Legal Opinion

Shoen v. Shoen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 89-140PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This case arises out of a struggle for control of Amerco Corporation. It is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a preliminary injunction sought by a group of Amerco shareholders to cancel the issuance of certain voting stock, to cancel acts based on the issuance of such stock, and to preclude further voting of the stock in question. We affirm the order of the trial court denying the injunction.

Amerco, a Nevada corporation, owns U-Haul Corporation, which is in the business of renting moving trucks and moving equipment. The business was founded some forty-five…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. GittlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
  5. Norlin Corp. v. Rooney, Pace Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Amerco v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Mobilisa, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API