Legal Opinion

Nystuen v. Spokane County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1938No. 26897. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover compensation for injuries to themselves and damages to their automobile sustained in a collision with a truck owned by Spokane county and being driven by defendant Pete Mele, one of its employees.

Plaintiffs allege the driver of defendants’ car was negligent in that he did not stop at a “stop” sign before entering the arterial highway upon which plaintiffs were driving, in failing to give the required signal indicating his intention to turn to the left, in failing to go to the center of the intersection before turning to his left, and in failing to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Ruff v. Fruit Delivery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. White v. FennerWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API