Akin v. Kewaskum Community Schools
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Although the plaintiffs-appellants state this issue in a much more detailed manner, we believe the issue to be whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction.
This action has not been tried. The trial court had before it only the motion supported by extensive affidavits, the complaint and arguments of counsel. The issues, both factual and legal, must await a trial and should not be disposed of upon the record as it now stands.
Sec. 268.02 (1), Stats., 1 provides that the trial court may grant a temporary injunction during the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- S. D. Realty Co. v. Sewerage Commission of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Beidenkopf v. Des Moines Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Werner v. A. L. Grootemaat & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Waste Management, Inc. Ex Rel. Waste Management, Inc. Boeing v. Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling AuthorityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- School District of Slinger v. Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. O'DELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Opinion No. Oag 86-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.