Legal Opinion

S. D. Realty Co. v. Sewerage Commission of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1961PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

While the 1958 lease does not expressly abrogate the 1956 agreement, the provisions of the lease are inconsistent with those of the agreement. Furthermore, it is conceded that the developers did not commence con struction of the installation to inclose the river within three years of the date of the agreement, and thus under its own terms the agreement has ceased to exist. Therefore, we shall forego any further consideration of the 1956 agreement in this opinion because any issue relating thereto is moot.

The remaining issues to be considered on this appeal are:(1) Is plaintiff entitled to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. David Jeffrey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. State Reclamation Board v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Sundby v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Thompson v. Kenosha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API