Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 86-77, (1977)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided October 11, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. LANDA, District Attorney Kenosha County

Your predecessor asked me whether a town is required by statute to advertise for proposals and to accept bids for town contracts involving public work of a nonconstruction nature, specifically contracts of purchase of material items for town use, such as special police vehicles and the like in excess of $2500.00. For the reasons given below, it is my opinion that, pursuant to sec. 60.29(1 m), Stats., and sec. 66.29, Stats., a town has an obligation to advertise for proposals and to accept competitive bids only for those contracts which fall…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. United States Rubber Co. of California v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rupp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. Oag 9-85, (1985), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API