Legal Opinion

Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Childress

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1889PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Practice in superior court. Trials. Torts. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Eulton superior court. September term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

Childress, a lad thirteen or fourteen years of age, recovered a verdict against the railroad company for $3,500, on account of a personal injury alleged to be permanent. The seat of the injury was the chest. The company made a motion for a new trial on several grounds, the 4th being as follows : “Because the court erred in declining to order the examination of Childress by physicians to be appointed by the court, on the motion of defendant before the jury was impanelled but after the case was called for trial, for the purpose of determining whether or not he had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. White v. Milwaukee City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Shepard v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. ThulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Walsh v. SayreThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. CluckTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Graves v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API