Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Thul

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. Action by Thul against the Railroad Company, to recover damages for personal injuries. Trial at the April Term, 1882, of the district court, and judgment for $400 and costs. The defendant brings the case to this cpurt. The opinion' contains a sufficient statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by John Thul against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Eé railroad company, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused through the negligence of the agents and servants of the defendant. The alleged injuries occurred about the 15th of December, 1881. At that time Thul was in the employ of the defendant as a section hand; and as he and other employés of the company were going out from Topeka on a hand-car to their place of work, they met an approaching train; they took the hand-car off the track, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. State v. Ah ChueyNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Loyd v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Devanbagh v. DevanbaghNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Le Barron v. Le BarronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Owens v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. CluckTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API