Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 7315DC658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

Defendant makes three assignments of error which he contends would justify reversal of the order of the trial court: (1) admission, of testimony of the plaintiff which implied adultery of defendant; (2) insufficient evidence of abandonment of the plaintiff by defendant; and (3) abuse of discretion in awarding excessive alimony and support. We do not consider any of these assignments of error to have merit.

G.S. 50-10 provides that in divorce cases “neither the husband nor wife shall be a competent witness to prove the adultery of the other.” This statute applies to actions for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of PaulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Spillers v. SpillersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API