Pruett v. Pruett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Plaintiff’s exceptive assignment of error, “That the Court erred ... in finding the facts ... as contained in Judgment,” is broadside. In re Sams, 236 N.C. 228, 72 S.E. 2d 421. Moreover, plaintiff, in his brief, makes no contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the findings of fact or any of them. Hence, we accept as established the facts as set forth in the court’s findings. In re Estate of Cogdill, 246 N.C. 602, 99 S.E. 2d 785.
The sole question for decision is whether the findings of fact and the facts appearing on the face of the record proper are sufficient in law to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.