Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 91-4746PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of their children against the Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA), alleging a failure to *558eliminate the danger of lead-based paint in housing owned or operated by the PHA. Specifically, plaintiffs allege that PHA violated § 1437 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, § 4801 of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act, and several state laws. Plaintiffs, in their Second Amended Complaint also bring an action against the Pennsylvania Department of Health, Bureau of Hospital and Outpatient Programs, and Regina…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. School District of Lancaster v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Minersville Coal, Co v. Anthracite Export Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arch v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Fry v. Hayt, Hayt & LandauDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Billieson v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Thomas v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Gibbs v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API