Legal Opinion
Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 22, 1976No. Nos. 75-1908 to 75-1910PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
The Truth In Lending Act is intended to provide sufficient data to the consumer so that he can make informed judgments on credit transactions. This appeal is concerned with interpretation of the Act and administrative regulations in connection with the purchase of an automobile. We conclude that an automobile dealer has the statutory duty to disclose credit terms when he receives a commission for referring a customer to the financing agency which advances the necessary funds.
Plaintiff, Mrs. Janet Manning, agreed to purchase a used car from defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Norlinda D. Philbeck v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc. And General Motors Acceptance Corporation,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Sellers v. WollmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Starks v. Orleans Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
- Philbeck v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Life of the Land v. LAND USE COM'N, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- James A. Rudisell v. The Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- J.D. v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.