Legal Opinion
Fry v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 22, 2000No. 00-114PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert F. Fry, Jr., on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, has brought this action against the defendant, Hayt, Hayt & Landau, seeking damages stemming from a collection letter sent by defendant to plaintiff and others that allegedly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Law, 73 P.S. § 201-1 et seq. (“CPL”), the Pennsylvania Debt Collection Trade Practices Regulations adopted under the CPL (“Regulations”), and the unfair and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Gregory Berry v. LexisNexis Risk and InformationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Collins v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Perry v. Fleetboston Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Vasquez v. Coast Valley Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.