Legal Opinion
Tinnerholm v. Parke, Davis & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 23, 1969No. 32697PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
411 F.2d 48
Eric R. TINNERHOLM, an infant under the age of fourteen years, by his Guardian ad Litem, Carl F. Tinnerholm, and Carl F. Tinnerholm, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
PARKE, DAVIS & CO., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 315.
Docket 32697.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued February 11, 1969.
Decided May 23, 1969.
Jacob D. Fuchsberg, New York City (Richard E. Shandell, and Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellees.
William H. Hillier, Chicago, Ill. (Joseph M. Costello, and Costello, Ward, Tirabasso & Shea, New York City, R. R. McMahan,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Schwartz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Stromsodt v. Parke-Davis and CompanyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1966
- Christopher v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Tinnerholm v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Figueroa v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Ezagui v. Dow Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Bevevino v. SaydjariDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.