Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.C.O. v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1987No. 20464PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Paul and Marjorie Anderson (the Andersons) appeal from a decision of the First District Juvenile Court terminating their parental rights in the children J.C.O. and E.J.A. We affirm.

The Andersons raise three issues on appeal: whether the evidence was sufficient to support a termination of parental rights; whether the State met its alleged duty to provide treatment and assistance; and whether the juvenile court had jurisdiction.

FACTS

The record reveals the following facts supporting the findings of the trial judge. Paul Anderson purportedly married Marjorie Olsen in September…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. O'Bryan v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. ClaytonUtah Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State in Interest of NRCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  2. State in Interest of JRT v. TimperlyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. N.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. R.E. v. B.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State in Interest of MWH v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API