Legal Opinion

N.T. v. State

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 29, 1996No. 950289-CAPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINS, Judge:

N.T. and T.T. appeal the juvemle court’s order terminating their parental rights to their four chüdren. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

N.T. (father) and T.T. (mother) are the natural parents of four chüdren: C.T., M.T., H.T., and S.T. The chüdren are now nine, eight, seven, and six years old.

The Division of Child and Faimly Services (DCFS) initiaUy became involved with appellants and their chüdren in June 1989, when a DCFS worker visited appeüants’ home to investigate a chüd abuse/neglect referral. *395C.T., M.T., and H.T. were two and one-half years, one year, and one month old,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In the Interest of J.C.O. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State, in Interest of Gd v. LdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. Oneida/SLIC v. Oneida Cold Storage & Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. J.D.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. State ex rel. S.L. v. C.A.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  4. E.B. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. E.B. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API