Legal Opinion

State v. Clayton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1981No. 17140, 16996PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

In each of these cases, counsel, who represented appellants at trial, has filed what has come to be called an Anders brief, requesting leave to withdraw from the appeal. While such matters are generally treated by minute orders, the Court has elected to publish this opinion for the guidance of the Bar in representing indigent appellants in criminal eases.

In Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the United States Supreme Court sought to clarify the responsibilities of appointed counsel who conclude that an indigent client’s criminal appeal is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boggess v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In the Interest of J.C.O. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. KORTH AND STEELESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. ShelbyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. L.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API