Pay 'N Save Corp. v. Eads
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.
—Kenneth and Jane Doe Eads (Eads) appeal from a judgment awarding damages to Pay 'N Save Corporation in connection with a stock purchase agreement. Eads contends that the trial court erred in: (1) dismissing the counterclaims for malicious prosecution and slander of title; (2) holding that Pay 'N Save's prejudgment writ of attachment was not wrongfully obtained; (3) adopting an audited figure as the measure of damages; (4) prohibiting the introduction of evidence regarding the value of Northwestern Drug Company (NWD) to Pay 'N Save; and (5) ruling that Pay 'N Save had not waived its right to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rorvig v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Brin v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.