Legal Opinion

Pay 'N Save Corp. v. Eads

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 13, 1989No. 20211-1-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

—Kenneth and Jane Doe Eads (Eads) appeal from a judgment awarding damages to Pay 'N Save Corporation in connection with a stock purchase agreement. Eads contends that the trial court erred in: (1) dismissing the counterclaims for malicious prosecution and slander of title; (2) holding that Pay 'N Save's prejudgment writ of attachment was not wrongfully obtained; (3) adopting an audited figure as the measure of damages; (4) prohibiting the introduction of evidence regarding the value of Northwestern Drug Company (NWD) to Pay 'N Save; and (5) ruling that Pay 'N Save had not waived its right to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rorvig v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Brin v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API