Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Estell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 13, 2000No. 17143-4-IIIPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

— For about five years Karen and Daniel Estell have been wrangling with neighbors Milton and Roberta Hanson over a 15- by 307-foot strip of land between their two properties. The Hansons won a prescriptive easement over this Estell-owned property. After the Estells tried to block access to the easement with a fence, the Han-sons sued again, for contempt, violation of a court order, injunctive relief and other causes. All of the Hansons’ claims were dismissed on summary judgment, but the Es-tells’ counterclaims for trespass, frivolous lawsuit and an injunction went to a bench trial. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Proctor v. HuntingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API