Legal Opinion
Crandall v. Prudential Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 29, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-3688PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action in which a former employee alleges her employer discriminated against her on the basis of age and sex by failing to promote her in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”). The plaintiff also alleges violations of New Jersey statutory and common law. In this motion the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on various grounds or in the alternative for summary judgment. For the following reasons the motion for summary judgment is granted.
Facts
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lesko v. Clark Publisher ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moses v. Phelps Dodge Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1993
- Samuel v. Home Run, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
- Bigsby v. RunyonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996