Legal Opinion
Samuel v. Home Run, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided February 10, 1992No. IP 89-1294-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ENTRY DISCUSSING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT HOME RUN, INC. ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM
TINDER, District Judge.
Paragraph eight of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant Home Run Inc. “was guilty of reprehensible conduct, oppressive and malicious action, gross negligence and intentional reckless, willful, and wanton misconduct in that it did violate and disregard the applicable laws of the State of Indiana____” (Pl.’s Am. Compl. 118.) Based upon that allegation, Plaintiff prayed for a judgment of punitive damages — apparently (and incorrectly) against…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- George Rakovich v. Gregory Wade and Darryl Drake, George Rakovich v. Chester KassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Box v. A & P Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westray v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kludt v. Majestic Star Casino, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
- Wauchop v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993