Legal Opinion
Proffitt v. Anacomp, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 20, 1990No. C-1-89-298PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT A. STEINBERG, United States Magistrate.
This case is before the Court upon defendant Anacomp’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Proffitt contends that she was discharged due to sex and age discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Title VII), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (ADEA), and Ohio Rev.Code § 4112.99. Anaeomp contends that it is entitled to summary judgment because: 1) no private right of action exists under Ohio Rev.Code § 4112.99; 2) Proffitt cannot establish that her gender…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Donnell v. Associated General Contractors of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Howard v. City of BeavercreekDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Walker v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009