Legal Opinion
Walker v. Davis
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided July 23, 2009No. Civil Action 1:09CV-6-MPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon a motion by the defendants, Danny Davis and Sam Carter, for summary judgment [DN 12]. Fully briefed, this motion is ripe for adjudication.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
In order to grant a motion for summary judgment, the Court must find that the pleadings, together with the depositions, interrogatories and affidavits, establish that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. The moving party bears the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carey Woodcock v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Johney Finn v. Warren County, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Mattingly v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
- Woodcock v. City of Bowling GreenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
- City of Brooksville v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.