Legal Opinion
Howard v. City of Beavercreek
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 8, 2000No. 3:98cv00541PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judg ment. The Plaintiff, Joseph L. Howard, has brought suit under the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. §• 3601, (“FHAA”), and under subsections 4112.02(H)(1), (4), (18) and (19) of the Ohio Revised Code, claiming the Defendant denied his request for a variance to the city’s zoning law to accommodate his handicap. For the following reasons, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
II. FACTS
Howard resides with his wife and son in Beavercreek,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jacob Scoggins v. Lee's Crossing Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Bachman v. Swan Harbour AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Dawson v. Bumble & BumbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.