Legal Opinion
Camp v. Booth
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 14, 1970PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiffs, Richard Camp, Jr., and his father, Richard Camp, instituted this action against the defendants to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by their negligence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of both plaintiffs against the defendant Booth, who then filed a motion to set aside the verdict because it was, inter alia, excessive. After the denial of her motion, she appealed and has assigned as error the denial of her motion to set aside the verdict as to Richard Camp, Jr., on the ground that the damages are excessive.
In reviewing the refusal to set aside a verdict such…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- McKirdy v. CascioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.