Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: George W. Stapleton, Judge. Department 2.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOXJBT, J.
This is an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff, which he alleges were caused by the negligence of the defendant. From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The injury for which plaintiff seeks damages occurred on May 3, 1921, at the lumber manufacturing plant of the defendant while plaintiff, an employee of the Willamette Iron and Steel Works, was engaged, with other workmen, in the installation of a mud-drum under certain of the boilers in defendant’s plant. Plaintiff was working in the mud-drum, when defendant’s foreman…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Samuelson v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Greenberg v. Western Turf Assn.California Supreme Court · 1903
- State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Moseley v. Lily Ice Cream Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- King v. Union Oil CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Celorie v. Roberts Bros., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Johnsen v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Newell v. TAYLOROregon Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.